Should Pitting for New Tyres Under a Safety Car be Scrapped in F1?

Aston Martin safety car. When deployed allows drivers to pit for new tyres

A safety car aided Max Verstappen to victory at the Dutch Grand Prix, allowing him to switch to fresher tyres.

Embed from Getty Images

Current rules allow drivers to make their pit stops and change their tyres when a Virtual Safety Car (VSC) or a Safety Car comes out because of an incident. Similarly, when a session stops because of a red flag, drivers gain a free pit stop neutralising the race.

Here drivers who have not made their pit stop benefit by losing less time coming into the pits than under normal racing circumstances. However, it can also disrupt some teams’ and drivers’ perfectly crafted strategies.

Recently at the Dutch Grand Prix, this rule prevented an exciting climax to the race, leading some to ask whether this rule should be scrapped or not.

Embed from Getty Images

Pole man Max Verstappen and the two Ferrari’s started the race on the soft tyres, whereas the Mercedes’ of Lewis Hamilton and George Russell started on the mediums. Mercedes’ tyre choice was interesting in mixing up the race with this strategy.

Starting on the mediums allowed them to go long and only necessitated one pitstop. Meanwhile, Verstappen on the softs had to stop twice, prophesising an intriguing end to the race as the Dutch driver would have to overtake the Mercedes for the win.

Embed from Getty Images

It was a race brewing for a fascinating finale until a strange incident occurred involving Yuki Tsunoda. The Alpha Tauri driver reported that his tyres were loose, forcing him to stop and return to the pits. He exited the pit lane, only to stop on the track again, bringing out the VSC.

Verstappen effectively had a free pit stop preventing a future fight with Mercedes for the win. Further drama ensued with Bottas stopping on track, allowing Verstappen to pit again for the softs, whilst Hamilton was on used mediums (did anyone else get Abu Dhabi flashbacks here?).

Hamilton, whose teammate Russell had pitted for soft tyres putting him behind Verstappen, was a sitting duck who was passed instantly by the quicker Red Bull on the re-start, allowing Max to take his home win.

Essentially it robbed fans of the exciting finish and potential Mercedes win. If it is ruining the spectacle of Formula 1, is it time to get rid of the rule? It hardly seems fair that some drivers gain advantages based on pure luck.

Embed from Getty Images

Whilst this worked against a different result at Zandvoort, luck has favoured a crazy race winner in other cases. Being able to pit under a safety car or a red flag has provided the sport with some of its most memorable races.

Just look at Pierre Gasly’s maiden win in Monza! Let’s face it Alpha Tauri would not have won that race under ordinary circumstances. However, a penalty for Hamilton and a red flag benefited Gasly and allowed him to win the Italian Grand Prix in 2020.

Embed from Getty Images

Or even the Abu Dhabi finale- lest we forget. Regardless of who you support, you cannot deny that the end of the race was fireworks! Ignoring the controversial circumstances around the safety car, it completely transformed the result not just for the championship but for drivers such as Yuki Tsunoda nearly getting a podium- he finished 4th!

Embed from Getty Images

Allowing drivers to pit under safety cars or red flags throws another strategic element into the mix. For crazy street circuits such as Baku or Jeddah, teams will work their strategy around the strong likelihood of a safety car, contributing to the tension of the race for the viewer.

In a sport where every detail will be calculated and measured, this pit stop rule adds a bit of flavour and anticipation of the unknown. You cannot predict when someone will crash or if an engine will stop working in a difficult place for a car to be retrieved.

Embed from Getty Images

Furthermore, it proves which team have the best strategists forcing them to think on their feet. Luck undoubtedly aided Verstappen at Zandvoort. However, Red Bull had to be switched on to complete a perfect strategy, only adding to the jeopardy. While Ferrari fumbled with their tyres, their clean strategic execution proves how well they are operating currently.

Regardless of what could have been, the Dutch Grand Prix was an exciting race helped by a safety car and the re-starts prompted by it. It also allowed drivers such as George Russell to show off their strategic capabilities, opting for the softs so he could get a podium and maximise his result for the team. He could still have chased for the win if that Mercedes had more pace!

Ultimately, how you feel about this rule is determined by whether your favourite driver gains from it or loses out because of it.

If you think drivers should not be allowed to pit for new tyres under a safety car, let us know in the comments below!

9 thoughts on “Should Pitting for New Tyres Under a Safety Car be Scrapped in F1?”

  1. Cars should not be allowed to change tyres under a VSC or full safety car period. That way the fastest driver/car wins which is what racing is all about. Some teams will leave drivers out on old tyres hoping for a safety car which cannot be safe for the drivers.

  2. The race is supposed to be neutralised during a safety car at least this is what we constantly hear, if F1 needs to rely on the random pot luck of safety car pit stops to add excitement then the sport is in trouble

  3. If I was being salty about Verstappen it would be about Red Bull exceeding the spending cap without any consequences

  4. I am British but not salty about Verstappen, at all, I disagree with the last bit of the article where it says how you feel depends on how it affects your favourite driver (mine would be Norris), I just do not like anything which is not fair whichever way it goes, for me it is an easy solve, calculate time lost/gained pitting under VSC or SC and make the car stationary for those X seconds, it makes things more equal and fair, why would you not want fair?? I hate tracks where there is no overtaking and races decided on pitstops, yes intriguing for a short while but ultimately boring

  5. Strange that this discussion only appears when a (certain) british driver has had no benefit from that SC. After Imola 2021 there was no such discussion,

  6. Funny that these discussion only come up (again) after a (certain) British driver has no profits from a SC. At Imola 2021 the articles never appeared. I wonder why?

    1. If you read the article you’ll find that I don’t think it should be scrapped. Just looking at both sides 🙂

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top
Share via
Copy link